Wednesday, July 17, 2019
How Far Do the Sources Suggest That James I’s Extravagance?
How besides do the bloodlines educe that it was throng Is exuberant large was the cause of his pecuniary problems? On the nervus of it the sources seem to disagree on this issue. Sources disco biscuit and xii seem to ground that jam unreasonable giving was the cause of his financial problems however source eleven seems to show that it was non pack profligate giving that caused his financial problems.In source ten, Matthew Hutton states that, His loftinesss subjects hear and fear that King James expansive and excellent constitution is too inclined to giving and that this will soon exhaust the treasury of his landed estate, thus implying that Jamess fast nature was and will be the cause of his financial problems. This is shape up backed up by source twelve as it states that James is rattling generous with his gifts and that gifts to the Scottish be create an incurable leak from the cistern, this is demonstrating how James extravagance is causing him financial trouble.Whereas on the face of it source eleven seems to disagree with the other cardinal sources as it demonstrates how it was non James extravagance that was causing him financial trouble. In this source it states that payments to the king, for example taxes ar not paid or collected and also The Earl of Dorset goes on to say that the fact James I has a family is another reason for his financial trouble.Furthermore as this this is a letter from the Lord Treasurer to The prime minister of the Exchequer this is the most unquestionable source about(predicate) whether it was James extravagance that was causing him financial problems as between them they are the people who look aft(prenominal) and maintain the treasury. However it feces be argued that entirely three sources agree to a large outcome that it was not James extravagant personality that caused his financial problems.Firstly in source twelve it does not specific all toldy say that he is extravagant also at the tim e it was write, 1604, James the I was not in truth in debt and so this is not a very time-tested source to find out whether James extravagance caused him financial problems. Source twelve can also back up the point that it was not James extravagant giving that caused him financial barrier as it states that, Parliament could replenish the treasury of his Majesty Treasury.This implies that it was parliament who caused James financial troubles as they did not give him the funds needed to suffice all of his needs, and so in order to negotiate with others he had to resort to giving as he was not given the money needed to create an army. Also, in source twelve the person who wrote the letter was not a part of the government and so this style that he would not have been that close to James to be able to judge whether he was an extravagant giver or not.This is backed up further by his statement, I understand from common slop thus implying that these are just rumours and so they are not a reliable source of reading for the listener, in this case John More, and as the info was not reliable that makes the source not reliable. Furthermore, as source ten was written a a couple of(prenominal) years before the rest it was not that reliable and this was further proved by the fact that it is written before the time that James ends up in debt.Therefore the sources, when taken together, show that it was not James Is extravagant giving that caused his financial difficulties, further that there were a lot of contributing factors express in source eleven which is the most reliable source and should therefore have the most charge put onto it. This is because the source is between the two lead members who are looking after James Is money.And sources ten and twelve are not that reliable so they do have so much weight put onto them thus livelihood up further that it was not James extravagant personality as on the face of it that was they suggest but. But when the sources ar e looked at collectively they show that it was not James extravagant giving that caused him financial trouble. Brendon Head Word Count (686 words)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.